terraform/plans/objchange/compatible.go

448 lines
16 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package objchange
import (
"fmt"
"strconv"
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty"
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty/convert"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/configs/configschema"
)
// AssertObjectCompatible checks whether the given "actual" value is a valid
// completion of the possibly-partially-unknown "planned" value.
//
// This means that any known leaf value in "planned" must be equal to the
// corresponding value in "actual", and various other similar constraints.
//
// Any inconsistencies are reported by returning a non-zero number of errors.
// These errors are usually (but not necessarily) cty.PathError values
// referring to a particular nested value within the "actual" value.
//
// The two values must have types that conform to the given schema's implied
// type, or this function will panic.
func AssertObjectCompatible(schema *configschema.Block, planned, actual cty.Value) []error {
return assertObjectCompatible(schema, planned, actual, nil)
}
func assertObjectCompatible(schema *configschema.Block, planned, actual cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
var errs []error
if planned.IsNull() && !actual.IsNull() {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("was absent, but now present"))
return errs
}
if actual.IsNull() && !planned.IsNull() {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("was present, but now absent"))
return errs
}
if planned.IsNull() {
// No further checks possible if both values are null
return errs
}
for name, attrS := range schema.Attributes {
plannedV := planned.GetAttr(name)
actualV := actual.GetAttr(name)
path := append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: name})
moreErrs := assertValueCompatible(plannedV, actualV, path)
if attrS.Sensitive {
if len(moreErrs) > 0 {
// Use a vague placeholder message instead, to avoid disclosing
// sensitive information.
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("inconsistent values for sensitive attribute"))
}
} else {
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
}
}
for name, blockS := range schema.BlockTypes {
plannedV := planned.GetAttr(name)
actualV := actual.GetAttr(name)
// As a special case, if there were any blocks whose leaf attributes
// are all unknown then we assume (possibly incorrectly) that the
// HCL dynamic block extension is in use with an unknown for_each
// argument, and so we will do looser validation here that allows
// for those blocks to have expanded into a different number of blocks
// if the for_each value is now known.
maybeUnknownBlocks := couldHaveUnknownBlockPlaceholder(plannedV, blockS, false)
path := append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: name})
switch blockS.Nesting {
configs/configschema: Introduce the NestingGroup mode for blocks In study of existing providers we've found a pattern we werent previously accounting for of using a nested block type to represent a group of arguments that relate to a particular feature that is always enabled but where it improves configuration readability to group all of its settings together in a nested block. The existing NestingSingle was not a good fit for this because it is designed under the assumption that the presence or absence of the block has some significance in enabling or disabling the relevant feature, and so for these always-active cases we'd generate a misleading plan where the settings for the feature appear totally absent, rather than showing the default values that will be selected. NestingGroup is, therefore, a slight variation of NestingSingle where presence vs. absence of the block is not distinguishable (it's never null) and instead its contents are treated as unset when the block is absent. This then in turn causes any default values associated with the nested arguments to be honored and displayed in the plan whenever the block is not explicitly configured. The current SDK cannot activate this mode, but that's okay because its "legacy type system" opt-out flag allows it to force a block to be processed in this way anyway. We're adding this now so that we can introduce the feature in a future SDK without causing a breaking change to the protocol, since the set of possible block nesting modes is not extensible.
2019-04-09 00:32:53 +02:00
case configschema.NestingSingle, configschema.NestingGroup:
// If an unknown block placeholder was present then the placeholder
// may have expanded out into zero blocks, which is okay.
if maybeUnknownBlocks && actualV.IsNull() {
continue
}
moreErrs := assertObjectCompatible(&blockS.Block, plannedV, actualV, path)
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
case configschema.NestingList:
// A NestingList might either be a list or a tuple, depending on
// whether there are dynamically-typed attributes inside. However,
// both support a similar-enough API that we can treat them the
// same for our purposes here.
if !plannedV.IsKnown() || !actualV.IsKnown() || plannedV.IsNull() || actualV.IsNull() {
2018-10-19 01:21:32 +02:00
continue
}
if maybeUnknownBlocks {
// When unknown blocks are present the final blocks may be
// at different indices than the planned blocks, so unfortunately
// we can't do our usual checks in this case without generating
// false negatives.
continue
}
plannedL := plannedV.LengthInt()
actualL := actualV.LengthInt()
if plannedL != actualL {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block count changed from %d to %d", plannedL, actualL))
continue
}
for it := plannedV.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
idx, plannedEV := it.Element()
if !actualV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
continue
}
actualEV := actualV.Index(idx)
moreErrs := assertObjectCompatible(&blockS.Block, plannedEV, actualEV, append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: idx}))
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
}
case configschema.NestingMap:
// A NestingMap might either be a map or an object, depending on
// whether there are dynamically-typed attributes inside, but
// that's decided statically and so both values will have the same
// kind.
if plannedV.Type().IsObjectType() {
plannedAtys := plannedV.Type().AttributeTypes()
actualAtys := actualV.Type().AttributeTypes()
for k := range plannedAtys {
if _, ok := actualAtys[k]; !ok {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block key %q has vanished", k))
continue
}
plannedEV := plannedV.GetAttr(k)
actualEV := actualV.GetAttr(k)
moreErrs := assertObjectCompatible(&blockS.Block, plannedEV, actualEV, append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: k}))
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
}
if !maybeUnknownBlocks { // new blocks may appear if unknown blocks were present in the plan
for k := range actualAtys {
if _, ok := plannedAtys[k]; !ok {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("new block key %q has appeared", k))
continue
}
}
}
} else {
if !plannedV.IsKnown() || plannedV.IsNull() || actualV.IsNull() {
2018-10-19 01:21:32 +02:00
continue
}
plannedL := plannedV.LengthInt()
actualL := actualV.LengthInt()
if plannedL != actualL && !maybeUnknownBlocks { // new blocks may appear if unknown blocks were persent in the plan
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block count changed from %d to %d", plannedL, actualL))
continue
}
for it := plannedV.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
idx, plannedEV := it.Element()
if !actualV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
continue
}
actualEV := actualV.Index(idx)
moreErrs := assertObjectCompatible(&blockS.Block, plannedEV, actualEV, append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: idx}))
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
}
}
case configschema.NestingSet:
if !plannedV.IsKnown() || !actualV.IsKnown() || plannedV.IsNull() || actualV.IsNull() {
2018-10-19 01:21:32 +02:00
continue
}
setErrs := assertSetValuesCompatible(plannedV, actualV, path, func(plannedEV, actualEV cty.Value) bool {
errs := assertObjectCompatible(&blockS.Block, plannedEV, actualEV, append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: actualEV}))
return len(errs) == 0
})
errs = append(errs, setErrs...)
if maybeUnknownBlocks {
// When unknown blocks are present the final number of blocks
// may be different, either because the unknown set values
// become equal and are collapsed, or the count is unknown due
// a dynamic block. Unfortunately this means we can't do our
// usual checks in this case without generating false
// negatives.
continue
}
// There can be fewer elements in a set after its elements are all
// known (values that turn out to be equal will coalesce) but the
// number of elements must never get larger.
plannedL := plannedV.LengthInt()
actualL := actualV.LengthInt()
if plannedL < actualL {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block set length changed from %d to %d", plannedL, actualL))
}
default:
panic(fmt.Sprintf("unsupported nesting mode %s", blockS.Nesting))
}
}
return errs
}
func assertValueCompatible(planned, actual cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
// NOTE: We don't normally use the GoString rendering of cty.Value in
// user-facing error messages as a rule, but we make an exception
// for this function because we expect the user to pass this message on
// verbatim to the provider development team and so more detail is better.
var errs []error
if planned.Type() == cty.DynamicPseudoType {
// Anything goes, then
return errs
}
if problems := planned.Type().TestConformance(actual.Type()); len(problems) > 0 {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("wrong final value type: %s", convert.MismatchMessage(actual.Type(), planned.Type())))
// If the types don't match then we can't do any other comparisons,
// so we bail early.
return errs
}
if !planned.IsKnown() {
// We didn't know what were going to end up with during plan, so
// anything goes during apply.
return errs
}
if actual.IsNull() {
if planned.IsNull() {
return nil
}
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("was %#v, but now null", planned))
return errs
}
if planned.IsNull() {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("was null, but now %#v", actual))
return errs
}
ty := planned.Type()
switch {
case !actual.IsKnown():
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("was known, but now unknown"))
case ty.IsPrimitiveType():
if !actual.Equals(planned).True() {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("was %#v, but now %#v", planned, actual))
}
case ty.IsListType() || ty.IsMapType() || ty.IsTupleType():
for it := planned.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
k, plannedV := it.Element()
if !actual.HasIndex(k).True() {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("element %s has vanished", indexStrForErrors(k)))
continue
}
actualV := actual.Index(k)
moreErrs := assertValueCompatible(plannedV, actualV, append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: k}))
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
}
for it := actual.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
k, _ := it.Element()
if !planned.HasIndex(k).True() {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("new element %s has appeared", indexStrForErrors(k)))
}
}
case ty.IsObjectType():
atys := ty.AttributeTypes()
for name := range atys {
// Because we already tested that the two values have the same type,
// we can assume that the same attributes are present in both and
// focus just on testing their values.
plannedV := planned.GetAttr(name)
actualV := actual.GetAttr(name)
moreErrs := assertValueCompatible(plannedV, actualV, append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: name}))
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
}
case ty.IsSetType():
// We can't really do anything useful for sets here because changing
// an unknown element to known changes the identity of the element, and
// so we can't correlate them properly. However, we will at least check
// to ensure that the number of elements is consistent, along with
// the general type-match checks we ran earlier in this function.
if planned.IsKnown() && !planned.IsNull() && !actual.IsNull() {
setErrs := assertSetValuesCompatible(planned, actual, path, func(plannedV, actualV cty.Value) bool {
errs := assertValueCompatible(plannedV, actualV, append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: actualV}))
return len(errs) == 0
})
errs = append(errs, setErrs...)
// There can be fewer elements in a set after its elements are all
// known (values that turn out to be equal will coalesce) but the
// number of elements must never get larger.
2018-10-19 01:21:32 +02:00
plannedL := planned.LengthInt()
actualL := actual.LengthInt()
if plannedL < actualL {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("length changed from %d to %d", plannedL, actualL))
}
}
}
return errs
}
func indexStrForErrors(v cty.Value) string {
switch v.Type() {
case cty.Number:
return v.AsBigFloat().Text('f', -1)
case cty.String:
return strconv.Quote(v.AsString())
default:
// Should be impossible, since no other index types are allowed!
return fmt.Sprintf("%#v", v)
}
}
// couldHaveUnknownBlockPlaceholder is a heuristic that recognizes how the
// HCL dynamic block extension behaves when it's asked to expand a block whose
// for_each argument is unknown. In such cases, it generates a single placeholder
// block with all leaf attribute values unknown, and once the for_each
// expression becomes known the placeholder may be replaced with any number
// of blocks, so object compatibility checks would need to be more liberal.
//
// Set "nested" if testing a block that is nested inside a candidate block
// placeholder; this changes the interpretation of there being no blocks of
// a type to allow for there being zero nested blocks.
func couldHaveUnknownBlockPlaceholder(v cty.Value, blockS *configschema.NestedBlock, nested bool) bool {
switch blockS.Nesting {
case configschema.NestingSingle, configschema.NestingGroup:
if nested && v.IsNull() {
return true // for nested blocks, a single block being unset doesn't disqualify from being an unknown block placeholder
}
return couldBeUnknownBlockPlaceholderElement(v, &blockS.Block)
default:
// These situations should be impossible for correct providers, but
// we permit the legacy SDK to produce some incorrect outcomes
// for compatibility with its existing logic, and so we must be
// tolerant here.
if !v.IsKnown() {
return true
}
if v.IsNull() {
return false // treated as if the list were empty, so we would see zero iterations below
}
// For all other nesting modes, our value should be something iterable.
for it := v.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
_, ev := it.Element()
if couldBeUnknownBlockPlaceholderElement(ev, &blockS.Block) {
return true
}
}
// Our default changes depending on whether we're testing the candidate
// block itself or something nested inside of it: zero blocks of a type
// can never contain a dynamic block placeholder, but a dynamic block
// placeholder might contain zero blocks of one of its own nested block
// types, if none were set in the config at all.
return nested
}
}
func couldBeUnknownBlockPlaceholderElement(v cty.Value, schema *configschema.Block) bool {
if v.IsNull() {
return false // null value can never be a placeholder element
}
if !v.IsKnown() {
return true // this should never happen for well-behaved providers, but can happen with the legacy SDK opt-outs
}
for name := range schema.Attributes {
av := v.GetAttr(name)
// Unknown block placeholders contain only unknown or null attribute
// values, depending on whether or not a particular attribute was set
// explicitly inside the content block. Note that this is imprecise:
// non-placeholders can also match this, so this function can generate
// false positives.
if av.IsKnown() && !av.IsNull() {
return false
}
}
for name, blockS := range schema.BlockTypes {
if !couldHaveUnknownBlockPlaceholder(v.GetAttr(name), blockS, true) {
return false
}
}
return true
}
// assertSetValuesCompatible checks that each of the elements in a can
// be correlated with at least one equivalent element in b and vice-versa,
// using the given correlation function.
//
// This allows the number of elements in the sets to change as long as all
// elements in both sets can be correlated, making this function safe to use
// with sets that may contain unknown values as long as the unknown case is
// addressed in some reasonable way in the callback function.
//
// The callback always recieves values from set a as its first argument and
// values from set b in its second argument, so it is safe to use with
// non-commutative functions.
//
// As with assertValueCompatible, we assume that the target audience of error
// messages here is a provider developer (via a bug report from a user) and so
// we intentionally violate our usual rule of keeping cty implementation
// details out of error messages.
func assertSetValuesCompatible(planned, actual cty.Value, path cty.Path, f func(aVal, bVal cty.Value) bool) []error {
a := planned
b := actual
// Our methodology here is a little tricky, to deal with the fact that
// it's impossible to directly correlate two non-equal set elements because
// they don't have identities separate from their values.
// The approach is to count the number of equivalent elements each element
// of a has in b and vice-versa, and then return true only if each element
// in both sets has at least one equivalent.
as := a.AsValueSlice()
bs := b.AsValueSlice()
aeqs := make([]bool, len(as))
beqs := make([]bool, len(bs))
for ai, av := range as {
for bi, bv := range bs {
if f(av, bv) {
aeqs[ai] = true
beqs[bi] = true
}
}
}
var errs []error
for i, eq := range aeqs {
if !eq {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned set element %#v does not correlate with any element in actual", as[i]))
}
}
if len(errs) > 0 {
// Exit early since otherwise we're likely to generate duplicate
// error messages from the other perspective in the subsequent loop.
return errs
}
for i, eq := range beqs {
if !eq {
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("actual set element %#v does not correlate with any element in plan", bs[i]))
}
}
return errs
}