Tidy eval_diff assignments and update plan action

When the sensitivity has changed, we want to write to
state and also display to the user that the sensitivity
has changed, so make this an update action. Also
clean up some assignments, since Contains traverses the val
anyway, this is a little tighter.
This commit is contained in:
Pam Selle 2020-10-07 10:59:28 -04:00
parent 33cbf2698d
commit 7c2ec1640a
1 changed files with 11 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -212,23 +212,11 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
return nil, diags.Err() return nil, diags.Err()
} }
// Create an unmarked version of our config val, defaulting // Create an unmarked version of our config val and our prior val.
// to the configVal so we don't do the work of unmarking unless // Store the paths for the config val to re-markafter
// necessary // we've sent things over the wire.
unmarkedConfigVal := configValIgnored unmarkedConfigVal, unmarkedPaths := configValIgnored.UnmarkDeepWithPaths()
var unmarkedPaths []cty.PathValueMarks unmarkedPriorVal, priorPaths := priorVal.UnmarkDeep()
if configValIgnored.ContainsMarked() {
// store the marked values so we can re-mark them later after
// we've sent things over the wire.
unmarkedConfigVal, unmarkedPaths = configValIgnored.UnmarkDeepWithPaths()
}
unmarkedPriorVal := priorVal
if priorVal.ContainsMarked() {
// store the marked values so we can re-mark them later after
// we've sent things over the wire.
unmarkedPriorVal, _ = priorVal.UnmarkDeep()
}
proposedNewVal := objchange.ProposedNewObject(schema, unmarkedPriorVal, unmarkedConfigVal) proposedNewVal := objchange.ProposedNewObject(schema, unmarkedPriorVal, unmarkedConfigVal)
@ -395,8 +383,7 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
} }
} }
// Unmark for this test for equality. If only sensitivity has changed, // Unmark for this test for value equality.
// this does not require an Update or Replace
eqV := unmarkedPlannedNewVal.Equals(unmarkedPriorVal) eqV := unmarkedPlannedNewVal.Equals(unmarkedPriorVal)
eq := eqV.IsKnown() && eqV.True() eq := eqV.IsKnown() && eqV.True()
@ -406,6 +393,11 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
action = plans.Create action = plans.Create
case eq: case eq:
action = plans.NoOp action = plans.NoOp
// If we plan to write or delete sensitive paths from state,
// this is an Update action
if len(priorPaths) != len(unmarkedPaths) {
action = plans.Update
}
case !reqRep.Empty(): case !reqRep.Empty():
// If there are any "requires replace" paths left _after our filtering // If there are any "requires replace" paths left _after our filtering
// above_ then this is a replace action. // above_ then this is a replace action.