From d1e5f9c2a2e2f2a4255115ba200707594aad02a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Flad Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 12:12:10 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] docs/state: Adjust mention of PGP encryption from RDS to IAM To better align with the current status of PGP usage and remove any confusion for the missing functionality. References: * https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/aws/r/iam_access_key.html * https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/aws/r/db_instance.html --- website/docs/state/sensitive-data.html.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/website/docs/state/sensitive-data.html.md b/website/docs/state/sensitive-data.html.md index acd26f8ad..817fa2b09 100644 --- a/website/docs/state/sensitive-data.html.md +++ b/website/docs/state/sensitive-data.html.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ and your definition of "sensitive." The state contains resource IDs and all resource attributes. For resources such as databases, this may contain initial passwords. -Some resources (such as RDS databases) have options for PGP encrypting the +Some resources (such as AWS IAM Access Keys) have options for PGP encrypting the values within the state. This is implemented on a per-resource basis and you should assume the value is plaintext unless otherwise documented.