resilien
/
terraform
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

core: Fix various state-pruning-related test failures 

These tests show that we're still not fully pruning modules from the state
in all cases, due to us not being able to fully prune out modules that
contain resources with count set after a destroy, but this is no worse
than before so we'll accept it for now and address this separately later.

A module heading without "<no state>" but also without any instances
listed is the rendering for a module containing a resource that has no
instances, since our old string rendering of state doesn't represent
resources themselves.
This commit is contained in:
Martin Atkins 2018-09-26 17:58:55 -07:00
parent 69bcbfb813
commit fdf7057ff5
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
terraform/context_apply_test.go
View File

@ -6577,7 +6577,6 @@ func TestContext2Apply_destroyWithModuleVariableAndCount(t *testing.T) {
expected := strings.TrimSpace(`
<no state>
module.child:
<no state>
`)
if actual != expected {
t.Fatalf("expected: \n%s\n\nbad: \n%s", expected, actual)
@ -6645,7 +6644,6 @@ func TestContext2Apply_destroyTargetWithModuleVariableAndCount(t *testing.T) {
expected := strings.TrimSpace(`
<no state>
module.child:
<no state>
`)
if actual != expected {
t.Fatalf("expected: \n%s\n\nbad: \n%s", expected, actual)
@ -6728,10 +6726,7 @@ func TestContext2Apply_destroyWithModuleVariableAndCountNested(t *testing.T) {
actual := strings.TrimSpace(state.String())
expected := strings.TrimSpace(`
<no state>
module.child:
<no state>
module.child.child2:
<no state>
`)
if actual != expected {
t.Fatalf("expected: \n%s\n\nbad: \n%s", expected, actual)