Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Katy Moe dc3ed6271c
add failing test for resource type mismatch 2021-11-15 11:05:33 +00:00
Martin Atkins 94cbc8fb5d experiments: config_driven_move has concluded
Based on feedback during earlier alpha releases, we've decided to move
forward with the current design for the first phase of config-driven
refactoring.

Therefore here we've marked the experiment as concluded with no changes
to the most recent incarnation of the functionality. The other changes
here are all just updating test fixtures to no longer declare that they
are using experimental features.
2021-11-01 08:46:15 -07:00
Martin Atkins 7b99861b1c refactoring: Don't implicitly move for resources with for_each
Our previous rule for implicitly moving from IntKey(0) to NoKey would
apply that move even when the current resource configuration uses
for_each, because we were only considering whether "count" were set.

Previously this was relatively harmless because the resource instance in
question would end up planned for deletion anyway: neither an IntKey nor
a NoKey are valid keys for for_each.

Now that we're going to be announcing these moves explicitly in the UI,
it would be confusing to see Terraform report that IntKey moved to NoKey
in a situation where the config changed from count to for_each, so to
address that we'll only generate the implied statement if neither
repetition argument is set.
2021-09-23 14:37:08 -07:00
Martin Atkins ef5a1c9cfe refactoring: ImpliedMoveStatements function
This new function complements the existing function FindMoveStatements
by potentially generating additional "implied" move statements that aren't
written explicit in the configuration but that we'll infer by comparing
the configuration and te previous run state.

The goal here is to infer only enough to replicate the effect of the
"count boundary fixup" graph node (terraform.NodeCountBoundary) that we
currently use to deal with this concern of preserving the zero-instance
when switching between "count" and not "count".

This is just dead code for now. A subsequent commit will introduce this
into the "terraform" package while also removing
terraform.NodeCountBoundary, thus achieving the same effect as before but
in a way that'll get reported in the UI as a move, using the same language
that we'd use for an explicit move statement.
2021-09-20 09:06:22 -07:00
Martin Atkins aa414f3ab3 refactoring: First round of ValidateMoves rules
This is a first pass at implementing refactoring.ValidateMoves, covering
the main validation rules.

This is not yet complete. A couple situations not yet covered are
represented by commented test cases in TestValidateMoves, although that
isn't necessarily comprehensive. We'll do a further pass of filling this
out with any other subtleties before we ship this feature.
2021-07-29 12:29:36 -07:00