Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Stack 4f58099a0e provider/aws: Remove restriction on running aws_opsworks_* on us-east-1 (#12688)
Fixes: #11824

A full set of acceptance tests for *all* OpsWorks tests are below. There is a single issue, opsworks_instance isn't ordering the layer_ids so it's non-deterministic which can come back. This introduces a false positive.

The opsworks tests are running both against us-east-1 for some and us-west-2 for others. This must be marked as a backwards incompatibility in 0.9 just incase people are using the opsworks region parameter to try and override the provider region

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication'                                                              2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:11:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication (164.29s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	164.319s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer'                                                                  ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:16:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayerImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayerImportBasic (105.98s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer (92.68s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	198.684s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission'                                                                   ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:23:28 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission (226.36s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	226.386s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer'                          ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:28:01 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer (129.39s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	129.426s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile'                            ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:37:46 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile (42.60s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	42.624s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack'                                                                     2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 18:00:50 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic (50.28s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc (25.92s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc (76.80s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	153.025s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance'                                                                                                               ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:38:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance (916.15s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	916.177s
```

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance'           2 ↵
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:26:45 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance_importBasic (85.52s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance (114.09s)
	testing.go:268: Step 1 error: After applying this step, the plan was not empty:

		DIFF:

		UPDATE: aws_opsworks_instance.tf-acc
		  layer_ids.0: "4c29b76f-df72-409e-a5c4-9459b7d9b4a4" => "a4a859cf-2a07-447e-a151-a97a6d827db7"
		  layer_ids.1: "a4a859cf-2a07-447e-a151-a97a6d827db7" => "4c29b76f-df72-409e-a5c4-9459b7d9b4a4"

      FAIL
      exit status 1
      FAIL	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws	199.643s
      make: *** [testacc] Error 1
```
2017-03-15 16:17:53 +02:00
DJ Home 56f35dd67d
Add ability to import AWS OpsWorks Custom Layers 2016-10-07 11:57:11 +01:00
DJ Home 979afcecdc Fix acceptance tests 2016-09-29 13:00:52 +01:00
DJ Home 1bc154535f Add ability to import OpsWorks stacks 2016-09-29 11:44:58 +01:00
Clint 4d66f1ca94 provider/aws: Opsworks Agent has a default, needs to be computed (#6555) 2016-05-09 11:26:16 -05:00
Justin Clark 380ada1019 provider/aws: Add agent_version argument to AWS_OPSWORKS_STACK 2016-05-05 22:56:44 +01:00
Justin Clark f430fe280a Fix issue with with Opsworks and empty Custom Cook Book sources (#6078)
* Remove computed value on opsworks update

* Adjust PR 6078 per catsby's request
2016-04-21 13:59:40 -05:00
Paul Stack 8335555636 Gofmt issues (#6246) 2016-04-19 20:41:26 +01:00
Justin Clark 8249cb10eb Resolves DefaultOS and ConfigurationManager conflict (#6244) 2016-04-19 19:59:03 +01:00
Martin Atkins e41616198f Don't read back opsworks stack cookbooks source password (#6203)
As with several other sensitive values in Opsworks, the API returns a
placeholder value rather than a nil. To avoid writing the placeholder
value into the state we just skip updating the password on read, letting
whatever value was in the state persist.

This means that Terraform can't detect configuration drift where someone
has changed the password via some other means, but Terraform will still
be able to recognize changes to the password made within Terraform itself
due to the "last-written" value in the state.

This fixes #6192.
2016-04-16 22:56:36 +01:00
Jeff Tang be0ebbc22e Handle race condition with IAM role permissions 2016-04-06 16:04:25 -04:00
Paulo Eduardo Deininger Messias Alves 0a0ccb84f2 Add DefaultOs on Stack creation (fix Windows stack issue) 2016-03-18 17:51:25 -03:00
Paul Hinze 108ccf0007 builtin: Refactor resource.Retry to clarify return
Change the `RetryFunc` from a plain `error` return type to a
specialized `RetryError` which must decide whether it is
retryable or not.

Add `RetryableError` / `NonRetryableError` factory functions that
callers are meant to use to build up these errors.

This makes it eminently clear whether or not a given error is
retryable from inside the client code.

Goal here is to _not_ change any behavior, simply reflect the
existing behavior with the new, clearer, API.
2016-03-09 17:37:56 -06:00
clint shryock f084871fad move the 'color' assignment 2016-01-13 11:16:36 -06:00
clint shryock aa7ba9ab9b provider/aws: OpsWorks updates
- add UseOpsworksSecurityGroups to the Create ops
- toggle waiting on said membership of groups
2016-01-13 11:13:09 -06:00
aibou 5e9c17d008 Implement some lacking parameters and stop waiting when in vpc and un-use opsworks default SG 2016-01-13 10:45:32 -06:00
clint shryock 266f216a13 provider/aws: Update Ops works tests, error catching 2016-01-06 11:19:42 -06:00
Buck Ryan 921944c956 Make the OpsWorks cookbooks SSH key write only
Fixes #3635

This follows the suggestion of @apparentlymart in
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/3635#issuecomment-151000068
to fix the issue of OpsWorks stacks always complaining about the custom
cookbooks SSH key needing to be changed.

Functional tests:

* Created a new stack and gave it an SSH key. The key was written to
  OpsWorks properly.
* Ran "plan" again and terraform indicated it needed to change the SSH
  key, which is expected since terraform cannot read what the existing
  SSH is.
* Removed the key from my resource and this time, "plan" did not have
  any changes. The `tfstate` file indicated the SSH key was "" (empty
  string).
* Changed an unrelated property of the stack. Previously this was not
  working for me due to terraform attempting to change the SSH key.
2015-12-09 16:58:05 -05:00
Radek Simko f9efede852 gofmt files from recently merged PRs 2015-10-07 13:35:06 -07:00
Martin Atkins 4ce3d089fb aws_opswork_stack resource type.
"Stack" is the root concept in OpsWorks, and acts as a container for a number
of different "layers" that each provide some service for an application.
A stack isn't very interesting on its own, but it needs to be created before
any layers can be created.
2015-10-05 22:47:44 -07:00