Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kristin Laemmert 2c60140cad
configs: do not panic if module version is a variable (#20681)
Fixes #20653
2019-03-14 09:12:27 -07:00
Martin Atkins 2c17558446 configs: New test cases for invalid interpolations in block labels
The parent commit fixes an issue where this would previously have led to
a crash. These new test cases verify that parsing is now able to complete
without crashing, though the result is still invalid.
2018-12-19 15:54:33 -08:00
Martin Atkins 0681935df5 configs: Reserve various names for future use
We want the forthcoming v0.12.0 release to be the last significant
breaking change to our main configuration constructs for a long time, but
not everything could be implemented in that release.

As a compromise then, we reserve various names we have some intent of
using in a future release so that such future uses will not be a further
breaking change later.

Some of these names are associated with specific short-term plans, while
others are reserved conservatively for possible later work and may be
"un-reserved" in a later release if we don't end up using them. The ones
that we expect to use in the near future were already being handled, so
we'll continue to decode them at the config layer but also produce an
error so that we don't get weird behavior downstream where the
corresponding features don't work yet.
2018-11-26 08:25:03 -08:00
Martin Atkins f77e7a61b0 various: helpers for collecting necessary provider types
Since schemas are required to interpret provider, resource, and
provisioner attributes in configs, states, and plans, these helpers intend
to make it easier to gather up the the necessary provider types in order
to preload all of the needed schemas before beginning further processing.

Config.ProviderTypes returns directly the list of provider types, since
at this level further detail is not useful: we've not yet run the
provider allocation algorithm, and so the only thing we can reliably
extract here is provider types themselves.

State.ProviderAddrs and Plan.ProviderAddrs each return a list of
absolute provider addresses, which can then be turned into a list of
provider types using the new helper providers.AddressedTypesAbs.

Since we're already using configs.Config throughout core, this also
updates the terraform.LoadSchemas helper to use Config.ProviderTypes
to find the necessary providers, rather than implementing its own
discovery logic. states.State is not yet plumbed in, so we cannot yet
use State.ProviderAddrs to deal with the state but there's a TODO comment
to remind us to update that in a later commit when we swap out
terraform.State for states.State.

A later commit will probably refactor this further so that we can easily
obtain schema for the providers needed to interpret a plan too, but that
is deferred here because further work is required to make core work with
the new plan types first. At that point, terraform.LoadSchemas may become
providers.LoadSchemas with a different interface that just accepts lists
of provider and provisioner names that have been gathered by the caller
using these new helpers.
2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
Martin Atkins b6fdd0446e configs: parse the "providers" map for module calls
This was accidentally missed on the first pass of module call decoding.
As before, this is a map from child provider config address to parent
provider config address, allowing the set of providers to be projected in
arbitrary ways into a child module.
2018-10-16 18:44:26 -07:00
Martin Atkins 5661ab5991 configs: allow full type constraints for variables
Previously we just ported over the simple "string", "list", and "map" type
hint keywords from the old loader, which exist primarily as hints to the
CLI for whether to treat -var=... arguments and environment variables as
literal strings or as HCL expressions.

However, we've been requested before to allow more specific constraints
here because it's generally better UX for a type error to be detected
within an expression in a calling "module" block rather than at some point
deep inside a third-party module.

To allow for more specific constraints, here we use the type constraint
expression syntax defined as an extension within HCL, which uses the
variable and function call syntaxes to represent types rather than values,
like this:
 - string
 - number
 - bool
 - list(string)
 - list(any)
 - list(map(string))
 - object({id=string,name=string})

In native HCL syntax this looks like:

    variable "foo" {
      type = map(string)
    }

In JSON, this looks like:

    {
      "variable": {
        "foo": {
          "type": "map(string)"
        }
      }
    }

The selection of literal processing or HCL parsing of CLI-set values is
now explicit in the model and separate from the type, though it's still
derived from the type constraint and thus not directly controllable in
configuration.

Since this syntax is more complex than the keywords that replaced it, for
now the simpler keywords are still supported and "list" and "map" are
interpreted as list(any) and map(any) respectively, mimicking how they
were interpreted by Terraform 0.11 and earlier. For the time being our
documentation should continue to recommend these shorthand versions until
we gain more experience with the more-specific type constraints; most
users should just make use of the additional primitive type constraints
this enables: bool and number.

As a result of these more-complete type constraints, we can now type-check
the default value at config load time, which has the nice side-effect of
allowing us to produce a tailored error message if an override file
produces an invalid situation; previously the result was rather confusing
because the error message referred to the original definition of the
variable and not the overridden parts.
2018-03-08 16:23:35 -08:00
Martin Atkins 4fa8c16ead configs: support ignore_changes wildcards
The initial pass of implementation here missed the special case where
ignore_changes can, in the old parser, be set to ["*"] to ignore changes
to all attributes.

Since that syntax is awkward and non-obvious, our new decoder will instead
expect ignore_changes = all, using HCL2's capability to interpret an
expression as a literal keyword. For compatibility with old configurations
we will still accept the ["*"] form but emit a deprecation warning to
encourage moving to the new form.
2018-02-15 15:56:39 -08:00
Martin Atkins 36fb5b52e7 configs: quoted keywords/references are warnings, not errors
In our new loader we are changing certain values in configuration to be
naked keywords or references rather than quoted strings as before. Since
many of these have been shown in books, tutorials, and our own
documentation we will make the old forms generate deprecation warnings
rather than errors so that newcomers starting from older documentation
can be eased into the new syntax, rather than getting blocked.

This will also avoid creating a hard compatibility wall for reusable
modules that are already published, allowing them to still be used in
spite of these warnings and then fixed when the maintainer is able.
2018-02-15 15:56:39 -08:00
Martin Atkins 8929eca405 configs: BuildConfig function
BuildConfig creates a module tree by recursively walking through module
calls in the root module and any descendent modules. This is intended to
be used both for the simple case of loading already-installed modules and
the more complex case of installing modules inside "terraform init", both
of which will be dealt with in a separate package.
2018-02-15 15:56:38 -08:00
Martin Atkins cc38e91612 configs: Implementation of mergeBody
mergeBody is a hcl.Body implementation that deals with our override file
merging behavior for the portions of the configuration that are not
processed until full eval time.

Mimicking the behavior of our old config merge implementation from the
"config" package, the rules here are:

- Attributes in the override body hide attributes of the same name in
  the base body.
- Any block in the override body hides all blocks with the same type name
  that appear in the base body.

This is tested by a new test for the overriding of module arguments, which
asserts the correct behavior of the merged body as part of its work.
2018-02-15 15:56:38 -08:00
Martin Atkins 7c8efe103e configs: allow overrides files to omit args that primary files can't
Some of the fields in our config structs are either mandatory in primary
files or there is a default value that we apply if absent.

Unfortunately override files impose the additional constraint that we
be allowed to omit required fields (which have presumably already been
set in the primary files) and that we are able to distinguish between a
default value and omitting a value entirely.

Since most of our fields were already acceptable for override files, here
we just add some new fields to deal with the few cases where special
handling is required and a helper function to disable the "Required" flag
on attributes in a given schema.
2018-02-15 15:56:38 -08:00
Martin Atkins 4e5efa498a configs: Parser.LoadConfigDir
This method wraps LoadConfigFile to load all of the .tf and .tf.json files
in a given directory and then bundle them together into a Module object.

This function also deals with the distinction between primary and override
files, first appending together the primary files in lexicographic order
by filename, and then merging in override files in the same order.

The merging behavior is not fully implemented as of this commit, and so
will be expanded in future commits.
2018-02-15 15:56:37 -08:00
Martin Atkins 9be399d49c configs: Another simple test for _invalid_ config files
Much like TestParserLoadConfigFileSuccess, this is intended to be an
easy-to-maintain collection of bad examples to test different permutations
of our error handling.

As with TestParserLoadConfigFileSuccess, we should also have more specific
tests alongside this that check that the error outcome is what was
expected, since this test just accepts any error and may thus not be
testing what we think it is.
2018-02-15 15:56:37 -08:00
Martin Atkins e524d1eb95 configs: Simple test of loading valid configuration files
This test is intended to be an easy-to-maintain catalog of good examples
that we can use to catch certain parsing or decoding regressions easily.

It's not a fully-comprehensive test since it doesn't check the result
of decoding, instead just accepting any decode that completes without
errors. However, an easy-to-maintain test like this is a good complement
to some more specialized tests since we can easily collect good examples
over time and just add them in here.
2018-02-15 15:56:37 -08:00