Containers (maps, lists, sets) in an InstanceDiff need to be handled in
their entirety. Unchanged values cannot be filtered out from diffs, as
providers expect attribute containers to be complete.
If a value in ignore_changes maps to a single key in an attribute
container, and there are other changes present, that ignored value must
be included in the diff as well.
Update all references to the version values to use the new package.
The VersionString function was left in the terraform package
specifically for the aws provider, which is vendored. We can remove that
last call once the provider is updated.
Rather than overloading InstanceDiff with a "Stub" attribute that is
going to be largely meaningless, we are just going to skip
pre/post-diff hooks altogether. This is under the notion that we will
eventually not need to "stub" a diff for scale-out, stateless nodes on
refresh at all, so diff behaviour won't be necessary at that point, so
we should not assume that hooks will run at this stage anyway.
Also as part of this removed the CountHook test that is now failing
because CountHook is out of scope of the new behaviour.
Changed the language of this field to indicate that this diff is not a
"real" diff, in that it should not be acted on, versus a "quiet" mode,
which would indicate just simply to act silently.
This fixes a bug with the new refresh graph behaviour where a resource
was being counted twice in the UI on part of being scaled out:
* We are no longer transforming refresh nodes without state to
plannable resources (the transformer will be removed shortly)
* A Quiet flag has been added to EvalDiff and InstanceDiff - this
allows for the flagging of a diff that should not be treated as real
diff for purposes of planning
* When there is no state for a refresh node now, a new path is taken
that is similar to plan, but flags Quiet, and does nothing with the
diff afterwards.
Tests pending - light testing has confirmed this should fix the double
count issue, but we should have some tests to actually confirm the bug.
When transforming a diff from DestroyCreate to a simple Update,
ignore_changes can cause keys from flatmapped objects to be filtered
form the diff. We need to filter each flatmapped container as a whole to
ensure that unchanged keys aren't lost in the update.
This commit improves the error logging for "Diffs do not match" errors
by using the go-spew library to ensure that the structures are presented
fully and in a consistent order. This allows use of the command line
diff tool to analyse what is wrong.
This set of changes addresses two bug scenarios:
(1) When an ignored change canceled a resource replacement, any
downstream resources referencing computer attributes on that resource
would get "diffs didn't match" errors. This happened because the
`EvalDiff` implementation was calling `state.MergeDiff(diff)` on the
unfiltered diff. Generally this is what you want, so that downstream
references catch the "incoming" values. When there's a potential for the
diff to change, thought, this results in problems w/ references.
Here we solve this by doing away with the separate `EvalNode` for
`ignore_changes` processing and integrating it into `EvalDiff`. This
allows us to only call `MergeDiff` with the final, filtered diff.
(2) When a resource had an ignored change but was still being replaced
anyways, the diff was being improperly filtered. This would cause
problems during apply when not all attributes were available to perform
the replacement.
We solve that by deferring actual attribute removal until after we've
decided that we do not have to replace the resource.
This means it’s shown correctly in a plan and takes into account any
actions that are dependant on the tainted resource and, vice verse, any
actions that the tainted resource depends on.
So this changes the behaviour from saying this resource is tainted so
just forget about it and make sure it gets deleted in the background,
to saying I want that resource to be recreated (taking into account the
existing resource and it’s place in the graph).
Previously these details were relegated to the debug logs, which forces
the user to reproduce the error condition and then go digging for the
error message. Since we're asking users to report this error, let's give
them all the details they need right up front to make it a little easier
on them.
James Bardin