* provider/aws - CloudFront custom_error_response fixes for missing
- Omit custom_error_response response_* fields when not explicitly set via config for
SDK call
- Adding a test case to ensure that the response_error gets converted
to an empty string properly, versus "0". (Thanks @vancluever)
Fixes#6342
* - Fixing ACC test case resource names
When an SQS queue was deleted from the AWS Console, an error was thrown
to say that the Queue could not be found. This is now fixed to remove
the queue from the state on a specific not found exception
This commit should fix the following acceptance test failures:
=== RUN TestAccAzureDnsServerBasic
--- FAIL: TestAccAzureDnsServerBasic (2.17s)
testing.go:172: Step 0 error: Error applying: 1 error(s) occurred:
* azure_dns_server.foo: Failed issuing update to network
configuration: Error response from Azure. Code: BadRequest,
Message: Multiple DNS servers specified with the same name
'terraform-dns-server'.
=== RUN TestAccAzureDnsServerUpdate
--- FAIL: TestAccAzureDnsServerUpdate (2.04s)
testing.go:172: Step 0 error: Error applying: 1 error(s) occurred:
* azure_dns_server.foo: Failed issuing update to network
configuration: Error response from Azure. Code: BadRequest,
Message: Multiple DNS servers specified with the same name
'terraform-dns-server'.
This change adds the support for the proxied configuration option for a
record which enables origin protection for CloudFlare records.
In order to do so the golang library needed to be changed as the old did
not support the option and was using and outdated API version.
Open issues which ask for this (#5049, #3805).
User may specify a vmdk in their disk definition.
The options size, template, and vmdk are considered
to be mutually exclusive. User may also set whether each disk
associated with the vm should try to boot after creation.
Todo: Enforce mutual exclusivity, validate the bootable_vmdk_path
The "find route in table" helper code was not properly handling routes
with no destination CIDR block - like vpc_endpoint routes - so if one of
those routes would come up before the target route in the loop, we'd get
a crash.
Fixes#6337
* Updated `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` to update environment when the `template_name` attribute has a change. Consildated update functions to use a single update call and added state change conf to wait until environment is in a "Ready" state.
* Adding tests for `aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template` use with the `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` resource.
* Verifies option settings from an `aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template` resource are applied to the associated `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` resource
* Verifies updated name of an `aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template` resource triggers an update for the associated `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` resource
* Verifies that option settings set in the `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` resource override settings in the `aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template` resource
Currently, the number of nodes was broken due to not passing the
node_type with the update. This PR adds the correct parameters and a
test to prove this works as expected
The validation as part of #6330 was only for length. This PR adds the
rules for alphanumeric, not having -- within, not ending with a - and
that the id must start with a letter.
The PR also adds tests for these rules
The azure tests relating to cdn endpoints (TestAccAzureRMCdnEndpoint_basic
etc) are breaking because ARM is not accepting port values of 0. The
following error is received:
statusCode:BadRequest
statusMessage:{"error":{"code":"BadRequest","message":"Invalid port \"0\". Port value must be a number between 1 and 65535."}}
This patch sets the ports for example.com to 443 and 80.
When a directory service was not found, Terraform was panicking due to
`dir := out.DirectoryDescriptions[0]`. The AWS API doesn't throw an
Error in this case. IT just return s0 results. Therefore, we should
check for 0 results in the return and remove the directory from the
state
This commit uses Riviera to register the Microsoft.Compute provider as a
canary for whether or not the Azure account credentials are set up. It
used to use the MS client, but that appeared to panic internally if the
credentials were bad. It's possible that we were using it wrong, but
there are no docs so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
As part of this, we parellelise the registration of the other providers.
This shaves the latency of each provider request times the number of
providers minus 1 off the "startup" time of the AzureRM provider. The
result is quite noticeable.
Paul Stack