Utilize the ChangeResourceRecordSets to change the type of a record by
deleting and recreating with a new type.
As change batches are considered transactional changes, Amazon Route 53
either makes all or none of the changes in the batch request ensuring the
update will never be partially applied.
Adds validation for the `type` parameter of an `aws_route53_record` resource.
This will allow Terraform to catch any user errors of a `type` parameter during a `terraform plan` instead of during a `terraform apply`.
Fixes: #11114
Fixes#9628Fixes#9298
When a route53_record alias is updated in the console, AWS prepends
`dualstack.` to the name. This is there incase IPV6 is wanted. It is
exactly the same without it as it is with it
In order to stop perpetual diffs, I introduced a normalizeFunc that will
that tke alias name and strip known issues:
* dualstack
* trailing dot
This normalize fun will continue to grow I'm sure
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/29 00:28:12 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (124.64s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (132.07s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (134.07s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (113.36s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (112.62s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (162.84s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (126.18s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (121.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (118.14s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (155.07s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (235.41s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
^[[C--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (125.32s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (122.23s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (231.98s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (116.48s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 2131.526s
```
Before this fix, I was getting the following by recreating the code in
```
~ aws_route53_record.alias
alias.1563903989.evaluate_target_health: "true" => "false"
alias.1563903989.name: "9828-recreation-106795730.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com." => ""
alias.1563903989.zone_id: "Z1H1FL5HABSF5" => ""
alias.318754017.evaluate_target_health: "" => "true"
alias.318754017.name: "" => "9828-recreation-106795730.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"
alias.318754017.zone_id: "" => "Z1H1FL5HABSF5"
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
After this fix:
```
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform
could not detect any differences between your configuration and
the real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
Fixes#9108
When an aws_route53_record alias is created with terraform and then
modified via cli or console, terraform wasn't picking up the changes. I
had the following config:
```
resource "aws_route53_record" "alias" {
zone_id = "${aws_route53_zone.main.zone_id}"
name = "www"
type = "A"
alias {
zone_id = "${aws_elb.main.zone_id}"
name = "${aws_elb.main.dns_name}"
evaluate_target_health = true
}
}
```
I changed the evaluate_health_target on the AWS console and terraform plan showed me this:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform
could not detect any differences between your configuration and
the real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```
When rebuilding the provider with the changes in the PR, a terraform plan then looks as follows:
```
% terraform plan
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-azurerm overrides an internal plugin for azurerm-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
~ aws_route53_record.alias
alias.1050468691.evaluate_target_health: "" => "true"
alias.1050468691.name: "" => "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"
alias.1050468691.zone_id: "" => "Z1H1FL5HABSF5"
alias.2906616344.evaluate_target_health: "false" => "false"
alias.2906616344.name: "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com." => ""
alias.2906616344.zone_id: "Z1H1FL5HABSF5" => ""
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
the apply then changed the target back to true
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/29 18:17:23 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (120.63s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (131.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (128.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (120.06s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (114.02s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (165.54s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (118.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (128.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (132.62s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (132.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (237.92s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (121.95s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (123.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (198.24s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (119.68s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws2092.597s
```
Fixes#9025
We were assuming there would always be a changeInfo record and then
dereferencing the ID. This wasn't always the case (As noted in #9025)
where it was a delete rather than a delete / create action
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/26 11:26:43 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (114.99s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (126.64s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (113.25s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (112.89s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (113.29s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (163.05s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (121.15s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (117.06s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (116.97s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (138.79s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (241.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (132.51s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (121.29s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (189.31s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (127.31s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws
2050.012s
```
delete
Fixes#6679
When we change the type of a record, it forces a new resource. We never
waited for the recordset to be in-sync after a deletion.
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws
% TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_'
% ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/03 17:55:03 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (85.54s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (101.75s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (84.01s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (85.08s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (97.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (141.08s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (91.25s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (89.01s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (88.91s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (103.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (174.71s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (89.50s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (89.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (138.09s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (88.51s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws
1684.774s
```
Added test for aws_route53_record with empty name
Integrated test for aws_route53_record with empty name
Changed test to use a third-level domain for zone
The `name` attribute will always be normalized to a FQDN, with a trailing "dot"
at the end when returned from the API.
We store the name as it's provided in the configuration, so "www" stays as "www"
and "www.terraformtesting.io." stays as "www.terraformtesting.io.".
The problem here is that if we use a full name as above, and the configuraiton
does *not* include the trailing dot, the API will return a version that does,
and we'll have a conflict.
This is particularly bad when we have a lifecycle block with
`create_before_destroy`; the record will get an update posted (which ends up
being a no-op on AWS's side), but then we'll delete the same record immediately
after, resulting in no record at all.
This PR addresses that by trimming the trailing dot from the `name` when saving
to state. We migrate existing state to match, to avoid false-positive diffs.
This is a follow up on #4892 with tests that demonstrate creating a record and a zone, then destroying said record, and confirming that a new plan is generated, using the ExpectNonEmptyPlan flag
This simulates the bug reported in #4641 by mimicking the state file that one would have if they created a record with Terraform v0.6.6, which is to say a weight = 0 for a default value.
When upgrading, there would be an expected plan change to get that to -1. To mimic the statefile we apply the record and then in a follow up step change the attributes directly. We then try to delete the record.
I tested this by grabbing the source of aws_resource_route53.go from Terraform v0.6.9 and running the included test, which fails. The test will pass with #4892 , because we no longer reconstruct what the record should be based on the state (instead finding via the API and elimination/matching)
This landed in aws-sdk-go yesterday, breaking the AWS provider in many places:
3c259c9586
Here, with much sedding, grepping, and manual massaging, we attempt to
catch Terraform up to the new `awserr.Error` interface world.
Route 53 records were silently erroring out when saving the records returned
from AWS, because they weren't being presented as an array of strings like we
expected.
Clint