Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Terrafoundry Ltd 79c4935604 Corrected example code, cleared up token confusion (#12177)
The adjustment was made after I spent a few minutes scratching my head, I have done the following: 

* Updated the 'provider' block in the first example code to be 'token' instead of 'access_key' - Didn't work previously. 
* Clarified locations of both 'access_key' and 'token' within the Scaleway panel, and appropriate naming.
* Removed "empty" section in example block at the bottom, as this fails with an error when attempted.

Overall I think this increases readability. I have tested this against my own Scaleway account.
2017-02-22 23:30:24 +02:00
George Christou 61277c0dbd website/docs: Run `terraform fmt` on code examples (#12075)
* docs/vsphere: Fix code block

* docs: Convert `...` to `# ...` to allow `terraform fmt`ing

* docs: Trim trailing whitespace

* docs: First-pass run of `terraform fmt` on code examples
2017-02-19 00:48:50 +02:00
Ollie Ford ed2b959f7e Fix contradiction in terms with provider documentation (#10815) (#10874)
* Remove contradiction with Scaleway documentation

The parameters previously termed by Terraform:

1. Organization
2. Access key

Are referred to, respectively, by Scaleway [0] as:

1. Access key
2. Token

which is a confusing contradiction for a user.

Since Scaleway terms (1) both 'access key' [0] and 'organization ID' [1],
@nicolai86 suggested keeping the latter as already used, but changing (2) for
'token'; removing the contradiction.

This commit thus changes the parameters to:

1. Organization
2. Token

Closes #10815.

[0] - https://cloud.scaleway.com/#/credentials
[1] - https://www.scaleway.com/docs/retrieve-my-organization-id-throught-the-api

* Update docs to reflect Scaleway offering x86

Scaleway now provides x86 servers [0] as well as ARM.

This commit removes 'ARM' from various references suggesting that might be the
only option.

[0] - https://blog.online.net/2016/03/08/c2-insanely-affordable-x64-servers/
2017-01-17 12:02:55 +00:00
Kit Sunde 835d5cfa78 Keep a consistent provider order. 2016-12-08 06:10:34 +08:00
Kot Chaosu b2eebebad1 add vars explanation 2016-10-13 23:21:41 +02:00
Kot Chaosu 5f4c0de3f8 add missing information
It's important to note this env var needs to be organization ID, at least for individual users (organization name doesn't work).
2016-10-11 11:25:54 +02:00
Raphael Randschau 5e107cd009
provider/scaleway: Update provider docs with new attribute 2016-10-10 20:05:26 +02:00
Louis-Paul Dareau ab36c4299f
provider/scaleway: Document ports in security group rules properly 2016-09-02 12:10:52 -04:00
Raphael Randschau 9081cabd6e Add scaleway provider (#7331)
* Add scaleway provider

this PR allows the entire scaleway stack to be managed with terraform

example usage looks like this:

```
provider "scaleway" {
  api_key = "snap"
  organization = "snip"
}

resource "scaleway_ip" "base" {
  server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
}

resource "scaleway_server" "base" {
  name = "test"
  # ubuntu 14.04
  image = "aecaed73-51a5-4439-a127-6d8229847145"
  type = "C2S"
}

resource "scaleway_volume" "test" {
  name = "test"
  size_in_gb = 20
  type = "l_ssd"
}

resource "scaleway_volume_attachment" "test" {
  server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
  volume = "${scaleway_volume.test.id}"
}

resource "scaleway_security_group" "base" {
  name = "public"
  description = "public gateway"
}

resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-ingress" {
  security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"

  action = "accept"
  direction = "inbound"
  ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
  protocol = "TCP"
  port = 80
}

resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-egress" {
  security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"

  action = "accept"
  direction = "outbound"
  ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
  protocol = "TCP"
  port = 80
}
```

Note that volume attachments require the server to be stopped, which can lead to
downtimes of you attach new volumes to already used servers

* Update IP read to handle 404 gracefully

* Read back resource on update

* Ensure IP detachment works as expected

Sadly this is not part of the official scaleway api just yet

* Adjust detachIP helper

based on feedback from @QuentinPerez in
https://github.com/scaleway/scaleway-cli/pull/378

* Cleanup documentation

* Rename api_key to access_key

following @stack72 suggestion and rename the provider api_key for more clarity

* Make tests less chatty by using custom logger
2016-07-13 21:03:41 +01:00