Previously we were using the type name requested in the import to select
the schema, but a provider is free to return additional objects of other
types as part of an import result, and so it's important that we perform
schema selection separately for each returned object.
If we don't do this, we get confusing downstream errors where the
resulting object decodes to the wrong type and breaks various invariants
expected by Terraform Core.
The testResourceImportOther test in the test provider didn't catch this
previously because it happened to have an identical schema to the other
resource type being imported. Now the schema is changed and also there's
a computed attribute we can set as part of the refresh phase to make sure
we're completing the Read call properly during import. Refresh was working
correctly, but we didn't have any tests for it as part of the import flow.
With the new diff.Apply we can keep the diff mostly intact, but we need
turn off all RequiresNew flags so that the prior state is not removed
from the apply.
One quirky aspect of our import feature is that we allow the importer to
produce additional resources alongside the one that was imported, such as
to create separate rules for each rule of an imported security group.
Providers need to be able to set the types of these other resources since
they may not match the "main" resource type. They do this by calling
ResourceData.SetType, which in turn sets InstanceState.Ephemeral.Type.
In our shims here we therefore need to copy that out into our new TypeName
field so that the new core import code can see it and create the right
type in the state.
Testing this required a minor change to the test harness to allow the
ImportStateCheck function to see the resource type.
If there were no matching keys, and there was no diff at all, don't set
a zero count for the container. Normally Providers can't reliably detect
empty vs unset here, but there are some cases that worked.
This is a HCL feature rather than a Terraform feature really, but we want
to make sure it keeps working consistently in future versions of Terraform
so this is a Terraform-flavored test for the block expansion behavior.
In particular, it tests that a nested dynamic block can access the parent
iterator, so that we won't regress #19543 in future.
In prior versions of Terraform we permitted inconsistent use of indexes
in resource references, but in as of 0.12 the index usage must correlate
properly with whether "count" is set on the resource.
Since users are likely to have existing configurations with incorrect
usage, here we introduce some specialized error messages for situations
where we can detect such issues statically. This seems to cover all of the
common patterns we've seen in practice.
Some usage patterns will fall back on a less-helpful dynamic error here,
but no configurations coming from 0.11 can end up that way because 0.11
did not permit forms such as aws_instance.no_count[count.index].bar that
this validation would not be able to "see".
Our configuration upgrade tool also contains a fix for this already, but
it takes a more conservative approach of adding the index [1] rather than
[count.index] because it can't be sure (without human help) if correlation
of indices is what was intended.
Terraform used to provide empty diffs to the provider when calculating
`ignore_changes`, which would cause some DiffSuppressFunc to fail, as
can be seen in #18209.
Verify that this is no longer the case in 0.12
Booleans in the legacy form were stored as strings, and can appear as
the incorrect type in the new type system.
Unset fields in sets also might show up erroneously in diffs, with
equal old and new values.
Added a list SetNew test to try and reproduce issues testing diff
customization with the Nomad provider. We are running into "diffs didn't
match during apply", with the plan diff exhibiting a strange
off-by-one-type error in a list diff:
datacenters.#: "1" => "2"
datacenters.0: "dc1" => "dc2"
datacenters.1: "" => "dc3"
datacenters.2: "" => "dc3"
The test here does not reproduce that issue, unfortunately, but should
help pinpoint the root cause through elimination.
Restoring the naming of this field in the resource back to
CustomizeDiff, as this is generally more descriptive of the process
that's happening, despite the lengthy name.
To keep with the current convention of most other schema.Resource
functional fields being fairly short, CustomizeDiff has been changed to
"Review". It would be "Diff", however it is already used by existing
functions in schema.Provider and schema.Resource.
It's alive! CustomizeDiff logic now has been inserted into the diff
process. The test_resource_with_custom_diff resource provides some basic
testing and a reference implementation.
There should now be plenty of test coverage for this feature via the
tests added for ResourceDiff, and the basic test added to the
schemaMap.Diff test, and the test resource, but more can be added to
test any specific case that comes up otherwise.
Prior to Terraform 0.7, lists in Terraform were just a shallow abstraction
on top of strings with a magic delimiter between items. Wrapping a single
string in brackets in the configuration was Terraform's prompt that it
needed to split the string on that delimiter during interpolation.
In 0.7, when first-class lists were added, this convention was preserved
by flattening lists-of-lists by one level when they were encountered in
configuration. However, there was an oversight in that change where it
did not correctly handle the case where the inner list was unknown.
In #14135 we removed some code that was flattening partially-unknown lists
into fully-unknown (untyped) values. This inadvertently exposed the missed
case from the previous paragraph, causing issues for list-wrapped splat
expressions with unknown members. While this worked fine for resources,
due to some fixup done inside helper/schema, this did not work for other
interpolation contexts such as module blocks.
Various attempts to fix this up and restore the flattening behavior
selectively were unsuccessful, due to a proliferation of assumptions all
over the core code that would be too risky to change just to fix this bug.
This change, then, takes the different approach of removing the
requirement that splats be presented inside list brackets. This
requirement didn't make much sense anymore anyway, since no other
list-returning expression had this constraint and so the rest of Terraform
was already successfully dealing with both cases.
This leaves us with two different scenarios:
- For resource arguments, existing normalization code in helper/schema
does its own flattening that preserves compatibility with the common
practice of using bracketed splats. This change proves this with a test
within the "test" provider that exercises the whole Terraform core and
helper/schema stack that assigns bracketed splats to list and set
attributes.
- For arguments in other blocks, such as in module callsites, the
interpolator's own flattening behavior applies to known lists,
preserving compatibility with configurations from before
partially-computed splats were possible, but those wishing to use
partially-computed splats are required to drop the surrounding brackets.
This is less concerning because this scenario was introduced only in
0.9.5, so the scope for breakage is limited to those who adopted this
new feature quickly after upgrading.
As of this commit, the recommendation is to stop using brackets around
splats but the old form continues to be supported for backward
compatibility. In a future _major_ version of Terraform we will probably
phase out this legacy form to improve consistency, but for now both
forms are acceptable at the expense of some (pre-existing) weird behavior
when _actual_ lists-of-lists are used.
This addresses #14521 by officially adopting the suggested workaround of
dropping the brackets around the splat. However, it doesn't yet allow
passing of a partially-unknown list between modules: that still violates
assumptions in Terraform's core, so for the moment partially-unknown lists
work only within a _single_ interpolation expression, and cannot be
passed around between expressions. Until more holistic work is done to
improve Terraform's type handling, passing a partially-unknown splat
through to a module will result in a fully-unknown list emerging on
the other side, just as was the case before #14135; this change just
addresses the fact that this was failing with an error in 0.9.5.
These tests cover the new refresh behaviour and would fail with "index
out of range" if the refresh graph is not expanded to take new resources
into account as well (scale out), or if it does not with expanded count
orphans in a way that makes sure they don't get interpolated when walked
(scale in).
James Bardin