Commit Graph

28426 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian 54a09b059f
error_count
# shouldn't it be true if the error count is zero

error_count (number): A zero or positive whole number giving the count of errors Terraform detected. If valid is 'true' then error_count will always be zero, because it is the presence of errors that indicates that a configuration is invalid.
2021-07-01 19:22:13 -04:00
Laura Pacilio dfc12a6a9e
Merge pull request #29051 from hashicorp/add-page-metadata
Add page metadata
2021-07-01 14:44:15 -04:00
Martin Atkins 6b8e103d6a configs: Include "moved" blocks when merging multiple files into a module
An earlier commit added logic to decode "moved" blocks and do static
validation of them. Here we now include that result also in modules
produced from those files, which we can then use in Terraform Core to
actually implement the moves.

This also places the feature behind an active experiment keyword called
config_driven_move. For now activating this doesn't actually achieve
anything except let you include moved blocks that Terraform will summarily
ignore, but we'll expand the scope of this in later commits to eventually
reach the point where it's really usable.
2021-07-01 08:28:02 -07:00
Martin Atkins d92b5e5f5e configs: valid-modules test ignores experimental features warning
A common source of churn when we're running experiments is that a module
that would otherwise be valid ends up generating a warning merely because
the experiment is active. That means we end up needing to shuffle the
test files around if the feature ultimately graduates to stable.

To reduce that churn in simple cases, we'll make an exception to disregard
the "Experiment is active" warning for any experiment that a module has
intentionally opted into, because those warnings are always expected and
not a cause for concern.

It's still possible to test those warnings explicitly using the
testdata/warning-files directory, if needed.
2021-07-01 08:28:02 -07:00
Martin Atkins 708003b035 configs: For Moved blocks, use addrs.MoveEndpoint instead of addrs.Target
Although addrs.Target can in principle capture the information we need to
represent move endpoints, it's semantically confusing because
addrs.Targetable uses addrs.Abs... types which are typically for absolute
addresses, but we were using them for relative addresses here.

We now have specialized address types for representing moves and probably
other things which have similar requirements later on. These types
largely communicate the same information in the end, but aim to do so in
a way that's explicit about which addresses are relative and which are
absolute, to make it less likely that we'd inadvertently misuse these
addresses.
2021-07-01 08:28:02 -07:00
Martin Atkins 4cbe6cabfc addrs: AbsMoveable, ConfigMoveable, and MoveableEndpoint
These three types represent the three different address representations we
need to represent different stages of analysis for "moved" blocks in the
configuration.

The goal here is to encapsulate all of the static address wrangling inside
these types so that users of these types elsewhere would have to work
pretty hard to use them incorrectly.

In particular, the MovableEndpoint type intentionally fully encapsulates
the weird relative addresses we use in configuration so that code
elsewhere in Terraform can never end up holding an address of a type that
suggests absolute when it's actually relative. That situation only occurs
in the internals of MoveableEndpoint where we use not-really-absolute
AbsMoveable address types to represent the not-yet-resolved relative
addresses.

This only takes care of the static address wrangling. There's lots of
other rules for what makes a "moved" block valid which will need to be
checked elsewhere because they require more context than just the content
of the address itself.
2021-07-01 08:28:02 -07:00
Martin Atkins 3212f6f367 addrs: AbsModuleCall type
Our documentation for ModuleCall originally asserted that we didn't need
AbsModuleCall because ModuleInstance captured the same information, but
when we added count and for_each for modules we introduced
ModuleCallInstance to represent a reference to an instance of a local
module call, and now _that_ is the type whose absolute equivalent is
ModuleInstance.

We previously had no absolute representation of the call itself, without
any particular instance. That's what AbsModuleCall now represents,
allowing us to be explicit about when we're talking about the module block
vs. instances it declares, which is the same distinction represented by
AbsResource vs. AbsResourceInstance.

Just like with AbsResource and AbsResourceInstance though, there is
syntactic ambiguity between a no-key call instance and a whole module call,
and so some codepaths might accept both to start and then use other
context to dynamically choose a particular interpretation, in which case
this distinction becomes meaningful in representing the result of that
decision.
2021-07-01 08:28:02 -07:00
Martin Atkins ab350289ab addrs: Rename AbsModuleCallOutput to ModuleCallInstanceOutput
The previous name didn't fit with the naming scheme for addrs types:
The "Abs" prefix typically means that it's an addrs.ModuleInstance
combined with whatever type name appears after "Abs", but this is instead
a ModuleCallOutput combined with an InstanceKey, albeit structured the
other way around for convenience, and so the expected name for this would
be the suffix "Instance".

We don't have an "Abs" type corresponding with this one because it would
represent no additional information than AbsOutputValue.
2021-07-01 08:28:02 -07:00
Laura Pacilio e6f1255869 Update vs Cloudformation description 2021-07-01 11:07:23 -04:00
Laura Pacilio ab9b9a445f Update vs pages to address PR comments 2021-07-01 11:01:21 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 09c79994f5 Update use cases page for PR comments 2021-07-01 10:43:24 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 04385bb9fc
Update website/intro/use-cases.html.markdown
Co-authored-by: Judith Malnick <judith.patudith@gmail.com>
2021-07-01 10:39:15 -04:00
Laura Pacilio a9e09a3ed9 Edit copy to address PR comments 2021-07-01 10:34:41 -04:00
Sam Salisbury 2fdf898680
Merge pull request #29064 from hashicorp/darwin-arm64
Build darwin/arm64 (RELENG-650)
2021-07-01 15:29:36 +01:00
hc-github-team-tf-core f2d1817a57 Cleanup after v1.1.0-alpha20210630 release 2021-06-30 16:07:59 +00:00
hc-github-team-tf-core e291ace3eb
Release v1.1.0-alpha20210630 2021-06-30 15:52:11 +00:00
Laura Pacilio 577c3653f2
Merge pull request #28983 from KurtLehnardt/patch-1
fixed typo
2021-06-30 08:54:04 -04:00
Laura Pacilio a7e24c384b
Merge pull request #28842 from iaoiui/patch-1
remove extra "be"
2021-06-30 08:52:51 -04:00
Laura Pacilio f9ec36383d
Merge pull request #29011 from vlad-ro/patch-1
Add back missing closing quote character
2021-06-30 08:51:47 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 4f12b8d917
Merge pull request #28863 from stensonb/patch-1
typo
2021-06-30 08:50:24 -04:00
Laura Pacilio f200c5d0ef
Merge pull request #29032 from hashicorp/izaaklauer/typo
Small comment typo
2021-06-30 08:44:11 -04:00
Laura Pacilio de97a03528
Merge pull request #28908 from kondr57/patch-1
fix typo
2021-06-30 08:43:26 -04:00
Sam Salisbury e17abccf2e ci: add darwin/arm64 to workflow 2021-06-30 12:45:53 +01:00
Sam Salisbury 2337334b1f ci: add darwin/arm64 build 2021-06-30 12:44:46 +01:00
Kristin Laemmert 35c19d7c9f
command/jsonstate: remove redundant remarking of resource instance (#29049)
* command/jsonstate: remove redundant remarking of resource instance

ResourceInstanceObjectSrc.Decode already handles marking values with any marks stored in ri.Current.AttrSensitivePaths, so re-applying those marks is not necessary.

We've gotten reports of panics coming from this line of code, though I have yet to reproduce the panic in a test.

* Implement test to reproduce panic on #29042

Co-authored-by: David Alger <davidmalger@gmail.com>
2021-06-29 10:59:20 -04:00
Laura Pacilio a2cab95dac
Update copy for active voice and concision 2021-06-29 09:15:01 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 740343cfd2
Update website/intro/use-cases.html.markdown
Co-authored-by: Tu Nguyen <im2nguyen@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-06-29 09:02:02 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 2cb8bbaacd
Update website/intro/use-cases.html.markdown
Co-authored-by: Tu Nguyen <im2nguyen@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-06-29 09:01:25 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 16bea6a949
Update website/intro/use-cases.html.markdown
Co-authored-by: Tu Nguyen <im2nguyen@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-06-29 09:01:13 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 7cb7d641b7
Remove top header and add provider language 2021-06-29 08:56:04 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 46708ea4bc
Update website/intro/vs/chef-puppet.html.markdown
Co-authored-by: Tu Nguyen <im2nguyen@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-06-29 08:44:53 -04:00
Laura Pacilio f526e6eadc Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 17:14:34 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 5e89ac590e Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 17:10:11 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 908ceec8c1 Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 17:06:50 -04:00
Laura Pacilio fc772aec86 Update page content for clarity, concision, and flow 2021-06-28 17:03:30 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 2f67c78821 Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 16:50:37 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 4111b1298d Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 16:47:37 -04:00
Martin Atkins 512e4e7f13
Update CHANGELOG.md 2021-06-28 13:44:24 -07:00
Martin Atkins 70bc432f85 command/views/json: Never generate invalid diagnostic snippet offsets
Because our snippet generator is trying to select whole lines to include
in the snippet, it has some edge cases for odd situations where the
relevant source range starts or ends directly at a newline, which were
previously causing this logic to return out-of-bounds offsets into the
code snippet string.

Although arguably it'd be better for the original diagnostics to report
more reasonable source ranges, it's better for us to report a
slightly-inaccurate snippet than to crash altogether, and so we'll extend
our existing range checks to check both bounds of the string and thus
avoid downstreams having to deal with out-of-bounds indices.

For completeness here I also added some similar logic to the
human-oriented diagnostic formatter, which consumes the result of the
JSON diagnostic builder. That's not really needed with the additional
checks in the JSON diagnostic builder, but it's nice to reinforce that
this code can't panic (in this way, at least) even if its input isn't
valid.
2021-06-28 13:42:28 -07:00
Laura Pacilio 5344ba0fa5 Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 16:00:16 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 0ab2012d77 Update page description metadata 2021-06-28 15:59:36 -04:00
Laura Pacilio e92f030662 Make get started bullet more concise 2021-06-28 11:38:21 -04:00
Laura Pacilio 60f240f8cf Update description and edit for concision and clarity 2021-06-28 11:33:06 -04:00
James Bardin c687ebeaf1
Merge pull request #29039 from hashicorp/jbardin/sensitive
New marks.Sensitive type, and audit of sensitive marks usage
2021-06-25 17:11:59 -04:00
James Bardin 80ef795cbf add marks.Raw 2021-06-25 14:27:43 -04:00
James Bardin 55ebb2708c remove IsMarked and ContainsMarked calls
Make sure sensitivity checks are looking for specific marks rather than
any marks at all.
2021-06-25 14:17:06 -04:00
James Bardin cdf7469efd marks.Has and marks.Contains 2021-06-25 14:17:03 -04:00
James Bardin d9dfd451ea update to use typed sensitive marks 2021-06-25 12:49:07 -04:00
James Bardin 2c493e38c7 marks package
marks.Sensitive
2021-06-25 12:35:51 -04:00
Kristin Laemmert 051c5c9d50
Update CHANGELOG.md 2021-06-25 08:53:29 -04:00