* Don't Base64-encode EC2 userdata if it is already Base64 encoded
The user data may be Base64 encoded already - for example, if it has been
generated by a template_cloudinit_config resource.
* Add encoded user_data to aws_instance acceptance test
We changed the way validation works for providers so that they aren't
always configured if they have computed attributes. The result is that
sometimes the Configure won't be called, hence Meta is nil
Some AMIs have a RootDeviceName like "/dev/sda1" that does not appear as a
DeviceName in the BlockDeviceMapping list (which will instead have
something like "/dev/sda")
While this seems like it breaks an invariant of AMIs, it ends up working
on the AWS side, and AMIs like this are common enough that we need to
special case it so Terraform does the right thing.
Our heuristic is: if the RootDeviceName does not appear in the
BlockDeviceMapping, assume that the DeviceName of the first
BlockDeviceMapping entry serves as the root device.
fixes#2224
This landed in aws-sdk-go yesterday, breaking the AWS provider in many places:
3c259c9586
Here, with much sedding, grepping, and manual massaging, we attempt to
catch Terraform up to the new `awserr.Error` interface world.
Depends on there being an existing placement group in the account called
"terraform-placement-group" - we'll need to circle back around to cover
this with AccTests after TF gets an `aws_placement_group` resource.
Currently, we weren't correctly setting the ids, and are setting both
`security_groups` and `vpc_security_group_ids`. As a result, we really only use
the former.
We also don't actually update the latter in the `update` method.
This PR fixes both issues, correctly reading `security_groups` vs.
`vpc_security_group_ids` and allows users to update the latter without
destroying the Instance when in a VPC.
Adds an "alias" field to the provider which allows creating multiple instances
of a provider under different names. This provides support for configurations
such as multiple AWS providers for different regions. In each resource, the
provider can be set with the "provider" field.
(thanks to Cisco Cloud for their support)
Fixes#1409
Resource set hash calculation is a bit of a devil's bargain when it
comes to optional, computed attributes.
If you omit the optional, computed attribute from the hash function,
changing it in an existing config is not properly detected.
If you include the optional, computed attribute in the hash and do not
specify a value for it in the config, then you'll end up with a
perpetual, unresolvable diff.
We'll need to think about how to get the best of both worlds, here, but
for now I'm switching us to the latter and documenting the fact that
changing these attributes requires manual `terraform taint` to apply.
I was working on building a validation to check the user-provided
"device_name" for "root_block_device" on AWS Instances, when I realized
that if I can check it, I might as well just derive it automatically!
So that's what we do here - when you customize the details of the root
block device, device name is just comes from the selected AMI.
Instance block devices are now managed by three distinct sub-resources:
* `root_block_device` - introduced previously
* `ebs_block_device` - all additional ebs-backed volumes
* `ephemeral_block_device` - instance store / ephemeral devices
The AWS API support around BlockDeviceMapping is pretty confusing. It's
a single collection type that supports these three members each of which
has different fields and different behavior.
My biggest hiccup came from the fact that Instance Store volumes do not
show up in any response BlockDeviceMapping for any EC2 `Describe*` API
calls. They're only available from the instance meta-data service as
queried from inside the node.
This removes `block_device` altogether for a clean break from old
configs. New configs will need to sort their `block_device`
declarations into the three new types. The field has been marked
`Removed` to indicate this to users.
With the new block device format being introduced, we need to ensure
Terraform is able to properly read statefiles written in the old format.
So we use the new `helper/schema` facility of "state migrations" to
transform statefiles in the old format to something that the current
version of the schema can use.
Fixes#858
* master:
provider/aws: Fix encoding bug with AWS Instance
minor style cleanups
Tags Schema
Added Tagging
Added vpc refactor in aws sdk go
Removed additional variable for print, added for debugging
Using hashicorp/aws-sdk-go
Changed things around as suggested by @catsby
Refactor with Acceptance Tests
VPC Refactor
First refactor
Added Connection to config
The `SourceDestCheck` attribute can only be changed via
`ModifyInstance`, so the AWS instance resource's `Create` function calls
out to `Update` before it returns to take care of applying
`source_dest_check` properly.
The `Update` function originally guarded against unnecessary API calls
with `GetOk`, which worked fine until #993 when we changed the `GetOk`
semantics to no longer distinguish between "configured and zero-value"
and "not configured".
I attempted in #1003 to fix this by switching to `HasChange` for the
guard, but this does not work in the `Create` case.
I played around with a few different ideas, none of which worked:
(a) Setting `Default: true` on `source_dest_check' has no effect
(b) Setting `Computed: true` on `source_dest_check' and adding a `d.Set`
call in the `Read` function (which will initially set the value to `true`
after instance creation). I really thought I could get this to work,
but it results in the following:
```go
d.Get('source_dest_check') // true
d.HasChange('source_dest_check') // false
d.GetChange('source_dest_check') // old: false, new: false
```
I couldn't figure out a way of coherently dealing with that result, so I
ended up throwing up my hands and giving up on the guard altogether.
We'll call `ModifyInstance` more than we have to, but this at least
yields expected behavior for both Creates and Updates.
Fixes#1020
AWS provides a single `BlockDeviceMapping` to manage three different
kinds of block devices:
(a) The root volume
(b) Ephemeral storage
(c) Additional EBS volumes
Each of these types has slightly different semantics [1].
(a) The root volume is defined by the AMI; it can only be customized
with `volume_size`, `volume_type`, and `delete_on_termination`.
(b) Ephemeral storage is made available based on instance type [2]. It's
attached automatically if _no_ block device mappings are specified, and
must otherwise be defined with block device mapping entries that contain
only DeviceName set to a device like "/dev/sdX" and VirtualName set to
"ephemeralN".
(c) Additional EBS volumes are controlled by mappings that omit
`virtual_name` and can specify `volume_size`, `volume_type`,
`delete_on_termination`, `snapshot_id`, and `encryption`.
After deciding to ignore root block devices to fix#859, we had users
with configurations that were attempting to manage the root block device chime
in on #913.
Terraform does not have the primitives to be able to properly handle a
single collection of resources that is partially managed and partially
computed, so our strategy here is to break out logical sub-resources for
Terraform and hide the BlockDeviceMapping inside the provider
implementation.
Now (a) is supported by the `root_block_device` sub-resource, and (b)
and (c) are still both merged together under `block_device`, though I
have yet to see ephemeral block devices working properly.
Looking into possibly separating out `ephemeral_block_device` and
`ebs_block_device` sub-resources as well, which seem like the logical
next step. We'll wait until the next big release for this, though, since
it will break backcompat.
[1] http://bit.ly/ec2bdmap
[2] http://bit.ly/instancestorebytypeFixes#913
Refs #858
Mitchell Hashimoto