The new data source planning logic no longer needs a separate action,
and the apply status can be determined from whether the After value is
complete or not.
Ensure that a data source with depends_on not only plans to update
during refresh, but evaluates correctly in the plan ensuring
dependencies are planned accordingly.
The state was not being set, so the change was not evaluated correctly
for dependant resources.
Remove use of cty.NilVal in readDataSource, only one place was using it,
so the code could just be moved out.
Fix a bunch of places where warnings would be lost.
Rather than re-read the data source during every plan cycle, apply the
config to the prior state, and skip reading if there is no change.
Remove the TODOs, as we're going to accept that data-only changes will
still not be plan-able for the time being.
Fix the null data source test resource, as it had no computed fields at
all, even the id.
The logic for refresh, plan and apply are all subtly different, so
rather than trying to manage that complex flow through a giant 300 line
method, break it up somewhat into 3 different types that can share the
types and a few helpers.
Start fixing plan tests that don't expect data sources to be in the
plan. A few were just checking that Read was never called, and some
expected the data source to be nil.
In order to udpate data sources correctly when their configuration
changes, they need to be evaluated during plan. Since the plan working
state isn't saved, store any data source reads as plan changes to be
applied later. This is currently abusing the Update plan action to
indicate that the data source was read and needs to be applied to state.
We can possibly add a Store action for data sources if this approach
works out. The Read action still indicates that the data source was
deferred to the Apply phase.
We also fully handle any data source depends_on changes. Now that all
the transitive resource dependencies are known at the time of
evaluation, we can check the plan to determine if there are any changes
in the dependencies and selectively defer reading the data source.
We need to load the state during refresh, so that even if the data
source can't be read due to `depends_on`, the state can be saved back
again to prevent it from being lost altogether.
This is a step towards having data sources refresh like resources, which
will be from their saved state value.
This transformer is what will provider the data sources with the
transitive dependencies needed to determine if they can read during plan
or must be deferred.
Adding a transformer to attach any transitive DependsOn references to
data sources during plan. Refactored the ReferenceMap from the
ReferenceTransformer so it can be reused for both.
GraphNodeAttachDependsOn give us a method for adding all transitive resource
dependencies found through depends_on references, so that data source
can determine if they can be read during plan. This will be done by
inspecting the changes of all dependency resources, and delaying read
until apply if any changes are planned.
Validate providers in expanding modules. Expanding modules cannot have provider configurations with non-empty configs, which includes having a version configured. If an empty or alias-only block is passed, the provider must be passed through the providers argument on the module call
If a configuration had multiple blocks in the versions.tf file, it would
be added to the `rewritePaths` list multiple times. We would then remove
it from this slice, but only once, and so the output file would later be
rewritten to remove the required providers block.
This commit uses a set instead of a list to prevent this case, and adds
a regression test.
Instead of using providers.tf as the default output file for the
upgrader, we now default to versions.tf. This means that if the
configuration has no `required_providers` blocks at all, or has
multiple, the provider version requirements will be stored in the
versions.tf file.
We now also update the versions.tf file to set a `required_version`
attribute in the first `terraform` block, with value ">= 0.13". This
is similar to the behaviour of the 0.12upgrade command, and signals that
the configuration should not be used with older versions of Terraform.
Validation is supposed to be a local-only operation, but Configure implementations
are allowed to make outgoing requests to remote APIs to validate settings.
This commit implements most of the intended functionality of the upgrade
command for rewriting configurations.
For a given module, it makes a list of all providers in use. Then it
attempts to detect the source address for providers without an explicit
source.
Once this step is complete, the tool rewrites the relevant configuration
files. This results in a single "required_providers" block for the
module, with a source for each provider.
Any providers for which the source cannot be detected (for example,
unofficial providers) will need a source to be defined by the user. The
tool writes an explanatory comment to the configuration to help with
this.
Both differing serials and lineage protections should be bypassed
with the -force flag (in addition to resources).
Compared to other backends we aren’t just shipping over the state
bytes in a simple payload during the persistence phase of the push
command and the force flag added to the Go TFE client needs to be
specified at that time.
To prevent changing every method signature of PersistState of the
remote client I added an optional interface that provides a hook
to flag the Client as operating in a force push context. Changing
the method signature would be more explicit at the cost of not
being used anywhere else currently or the optional interface pattern
could be applied to the state itself so it could be upgraded to
support PersistState(force bool) only when needed.
Prior to this only the resources of the state were checked for
changes not the lineage or the serial. To bring this in line with
documented behavior noted above those attributes also have a “read”
counterpart just like state has. These are now checked along with
state to determine if the state as a whole is unchanged.
Tests were altered to table driven test format and testing was
expanded to include WriteStateForMigration and its interaction
with a ClientForcePusher type.
Providers like Okta and AWS Cognito expect that the PKCE challenge
uses base64 URL Encoding without any padding (base64.RawURLEncoding)
Additionally, Okta strictly adheres to section 4.2 of RFC 7636 and
requires that the unencoded key for the PKCE data is at least 43
characters in length.
We only persist a new state if the actual state contents have
changed. This test demonstrates that behavior by calling write
and persist methods when either the lineage or serial have changed.
James Bardin